留言板

Liferay 6.2 + AngularJS vs Liferay 7.0 + AngularJS

thumbnail
Nurul Amin,修改在7 年前。

Liferay 6.2 + AngularJS vs Liferay 7.0 + AngularJS

New Member 帖子: 8 加入日期: 15-11-27 最近的帖子
I heard, it is easier to write AngularJS portlet with Liferay 7.0 (DXP) compared to Liferay 6.2.

Is it true? Why?

As Liferay natively is based on AUI, I was expecting effort to use AngularJS in Liferay 6.2 or 7.0 is similar.

What do you think?
thumbnail
David H Nebinger,修改在7 年前。

RE: Liferay 6.2 + AngularJS vs Liferay 7.0 + AngularJS

Liferay Legend 帖子: 14919 加入日期: 06-9-2 最近的帖子
I think the AMD loader is the part that should make it easier, making it possible to quickly add new JS extensions.

From a portlet perspective, they are similar in implementation and similar in problems.
thumbnail
Nurul Amin,修改在7 年前。

RE: Liferay 6.2 + AngularJS vs Liferay 7.0 + AngularJS

New Member 帖子: 8 加入日期: 15-11-27 最近的帖子
Thanks for your reply.

AMD loader. Okay.

It would be great, if you can explain a bit more.

Thanks in advance.
Ricardo Legorreta,修改在7 年前。

RE: Liferay 6.2 + AngularJS vs Liferay 7.0 + AngularJS

New Member 帖子: 9 加入日期: 15-12-3 最近的帖子
I could integrated AngulrJS with Liferay 6 with no problem.

Does anybody has experience t migrate AngularJS to Liferay DXP? Is there any POC?

Thanks,
thumbnail
Ujjainee Sarkar,修改在7 年前。

RE: Liferay 6.2 + AngularJS vs Liferay 7.0 + AngularJS

Regular Member 帖子: 127 加入日期: 16-7-20 最近的帖子
Hello Ricardo,
Did you find any poc for migration? I have also migrated my angular Js portlets from Liferay 6.2CE to Liferay DXP with the help of Liferay Code Upgrade tool but none of the functions are working like before. Do you have any solution for that?
thumbnail
David H Nebinger,修改在7 年前。

RE: Liferay 6.2 + AngularJS vs Liferay 7.0 + AngularJS

Liferay Legend 帖子: 14919 加入日期: 06-9-2 最近的帖子
Remember that any URLs you invoke against the back end will be prefixed with "/o", so like "/o/my-angular-portlet/xxx" sort of thing.