Alex Wallace 15 Years Ago This is very interesting!I will take a look at both Hudson and SLAMD...It sounds like SLAMD can be complex though.Great job! Please sign in to reply. Reply as... Cancel Pascale Françoise Woodruff Alex Wallace 15 Years Ago Hello you Please sign in to reply. Reply as... Cancel
Pascale Françoise Woodruff Alex Wallace 15 Years Ago Hello you Please sign in to reply. Reply as... Cancel
Guido Kaltwasser 15 Years Ago Hi Michael,since we are in the middle of sizing our hardware, I would appreciate it, if you could post some performance benchmarks for your hardware test environment.unique users / hour:number of sessions / hour:page views / hour:Cheers Guido Please sign in to reply. Reply as... Cancel
Kyrre Myrbostad 15 Years Ago I'd love to see some results from this. Have the process stopped or are you still at it? Please sign in to reply. Reply as... Cancel Michael C. Han Kyrre Myrbostad 14 Years Ago The process continues...we're releasing the benchmarks and tuning guides to our EE subscription customers. They will also benefit from the enhancements in our 5.1 EE and 5.2 EE product lines. The community will receive benefits of various tunings in the 5.3 SE release. Please sign in to reply. Reply as... Cancel
Michael C. Han Kyrre Myrbostad 14 Years Ago The process continues...we're releasing the benchmarks and tuning guides to our EE subscription customers. They will also benefit from the enhancements in our 5.1 EE and 5.2 EE product lines. The community will receive benefits of various tunings in the 5.3 SE release. Please sign in to reply. Reply as... Cancel
Jakub Liska 13 Years Ago Hey,Liferay is able to handle huge numbers of concurrent users according to some benchmarks that say thousands of concurrent users can be browsing pages with portlets (not anonymously) and up to 150k of concurrent users browsing anonymously WCM content. Not counting the fact that in the benchmark I saw, database and http server are running on different machines, we are talking about 70 to 150 transactions per second (or http requests) for logging and portlets using, where load of CPU with 8 cores 2,66GHz, varies from 40% to 90%.But I haven't seen a benchmark that would use only one machine for all components. If the machine has only 2 cores and 2GB of RAM, what results could we expect ? I don't have much experiences here, certainly can't say how much of load database and http server take itself.For now I tried these machines: (database locally, no http server, on tomcat)AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1800+ ( 1536Ghz, cache 256 KB, 1,5MG RAM) - I guess this represents the minimal requirements for development purposes :-), because response time was a little higher and CPU load was reaching approximately 20% for each individual request after all JSPs got compiled etc...I can't imagine that it could handle like 5 requests per second.dual core, 1800MGhz and 2GB RAM - response time was very fast and CPU load was reaching 5-10% for each individual request... I suppose it could handle 10 requests per second without problemAMD Phenom(tm) 9950 Quad-Core ( 2600 GHz, 2MB cache total, 4GB RAM ) - the CPU load spreat nicely between the cores, I let 4 persons making requests and the first core had constant load around 15% and the others almost no load. I hope that other people will share here on what machines they run Liferay, how many requests per second they handle, what architecture, etc.Cheers Please sign in to reply. Reply as... Cancel