Bavithra Rajendran 14 Years Ago Very Informative. Thanks for sharing! Please sign in to reply. Reply as... Cancel
Eduard Korenschi 14 Years Ago Hello,While not 100% related to the article, I am very interested in the possibility to add a description to categories. I would like for example to implement a taxonomy similar to the one on isinet (http://science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/scope/scope_ahci/). So, while each category would cover many related fields, it would require an explanation about the covered fields. Would it be readily available, or does it need custom development.Thanks and great work again! Please sign in to reply. Reply as... Cancel Jonas Yuan Eduard Korenschi 14 Years Ago Hi Eduard, thanks for sharing. You may be interested in Ontology. The following is abstracted from the book: Liferay Portal 6 Enterprise Intranets.Why it doesn’t merge both kinds of tags through Ontology? As you can see, there are two kinds of tags: taxonomies and folksonomies. Both of them could be used as a way of organizing and aggregating content. Folksonomy is a way of classification, creating and managing tags to annotate and categorize content; while taxonomy is a hierarchical structure for classification. In fact, taxonomies and folksonomies are different. Taxonomies are a closed set of categories (or called tags) and the vocabulary, created and organized in a hierarchical structure. It helps standardization, especially when you store it in Shared Global group to standardize categorization through all of the organizations. In a word, Folksonomies are an open set of tags, extended by the end user.Why doesn’t merge both through ontology? Ontology, the study of entities and their relations, is less concerned with what is than with what is possible. The answer would be “yes” and it is highly expected. Please sign in to reply. Reply as... Cancel
Jonas Yuan Eduard Korenschi 14 Years Ago Hi Eduard, thanks for sharing. You may be interested in Ontology. The following is abstracted from the book: Liferay Portal 6 Enterprise Intranets.Why it doesn’t merge both kinds of tags through Ontology? As you can see, there are two kinds of tags: taxonomies and folksonomies. Both of them could be used as a way of organizing and aggregating content. Folksonomy is a way of classification, creating and managing tags to annotate and categorize content; while taxonomy is a hierarchical structure for classification. In fact, taxonomies and folksonomies are different. Taxonomies are a closed set of categories (or called tags) and the vocabulary, created and organized in a hierarchical structure. It helps standardization, especially when you store it in Shared Global group to standardize categorization through all of the organizations. In a word, Folksonomies are an open set of tags, extended by the end user.Why doesn’t merge both through ontology? Ontology, the study of entities and their relations, is less concerned with what is than with what is possible. The answer would be “yes” and it is highly expected. Please sign in to reply. Reply as... Cancel