John Arne 16年 前 Why don't you just use checkstyle? 投票するためにはログインが必要です。 次として送信する: キャンセル Minhchau Dang John Arne 16年 前 - 編集済み I'd never heard of the checkstyle project (http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/) before your reply. Thanks for the heads up! At a glance, it likely satisfies the style requirements for a lot of different projects. But, on its own, it still falls short of the Liferay coding requirements described in the wiki.checkstyle provides one extra feature that Jalopy didn't support (naming conventions), so if we combine all the known tools (both free and commercial), we come pretty close. The only things missing are naming conventions for private methods but not public methods, and grouping of getters and setters for readability. 投票するためにはログインが必要です。 次として送信する: キャンセル
Minhchau Dang John Arne 16年 前 - 編集済み I'd never heard of the checkstyle project (http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/) before your reply. Thanks for the heads up! At a glance, it likely satisfies the style requirements for a lot of different projects. But, on its own, it still falls short of the Liferay coding requirements described in the wiki.checkstyle provides one extra feature that Jalopy didn't support (naming conventions), so if we combine all the known tools (both free and commercial), we come pretty close. The only things missing are naming conventions for private methods but not public methods, and grouping of getters and setters for readability. 投票するためにはログインが必要です。 次として送信する: キャンセル
Jorge Ferrer 16年 前 Hi Minhchau,That's very nice. Could you add it to the wiki article? 投票するためにはログインが必要です。 次として送信する: キャンセル
Steffen Schuler 7年 前 It is an old article... what is the current state, when it comes to applying style to code? Is there a checkstyle rule file available, these days? 投票するためにはログインが必要です。 次として送信する: キャンセル