Rainer Schmitz 15年 前 This "Client-side Inter-Portlet Communication" seems to be very similar to the Open Ajay approach (http://www.openajax.org/member/wiki/OpenAjax_Hub_1.0_Specification_PublishSubscribe).Is there a special reason for inventing your own system? 投票するためにはログインが必要です。 次として送信する: キャンセル Jorge Ferrer Rainer Schmitz 15年 前 Hi Rainer,I didn't implement our current system, but I'm pretty sure it's been done this way because the developer either didn't know about the OpenAjax solution or because it wasn't final or stable enough.In any case we are keeping an eye on all of the standards of OpenAjax so we'll be glad to implement all of those that catch up. There has been some concerns in the past with their implementation of their hub which is probably why they haven't been so successful yet, but I guess they have already fixed that or will soon. 投票するためにはログインが必要です。 次として送信する: キャンセル Björn Ryding Jorge Ferrer 15年 前 Hi Jorge,<a href="http://www.liferay.com/web/guest/community/forums/-/message_boards/message/1036340">I just wrote a few lines in the forums</a> about why it might be a good idea to have a separate Liferay solution. If I have understood the motivation behind your decision correctly, I consider the two solutions complementary. 投票するためにはログインが必要です。 次として送信する: キャンセル
Jorge Ferrer Rainer Schmitz 15年 前 Hi Rainer,I didn't implement our current system, but I'm pretty sure it's been done this way because the developer either didn't know about the OpenAjax solution or because it wasn't final or stable enough.In any case we are keeping an eye on all of the standards of OpenAjax so we'll be glad to implement all of those that catch up. There has been some concerns in the past with their implementation of their hub which is probably why they haven't been so successful yet, but I guess they have already fixed that or will soon. 投票するためにはログインが必要です。 次として送信する: キャンセル Björn Ryding Jorge Ferrer 15年 前 Hi Jorge,<a href="http://www.liferay.com/web/guest/community/forums/-/message_boards/message/1036340">I just wrote a few lines in the forums</a> about why it might be a good idea to have a separate Liferay solution. If I have understood the motivation behind your decision correctly, I consider the two solutions complementary. 投票するためにはログインが必要です。 次として送信する: キャンセル
Björn Ryding Jorge Ferrer 15年 前 Hi Jorge,<a href="http://www.liferay.com/web/guest/community/forums/-/message_boards/message/1036340">I just wrote a few lines in the forums</a> about why it might be a good idea to have a separate Liferay solution. If I have understood the motivation behind your decision correctly, I consider the two solutions complementary. 投票するためにはログインが必要です。 次として送信する: キャンセル
Rajesh Thekkadath 15年 前 The link doesnt seems to work properly. Can you please edit the page for (a) Client Side Inter Portlet Communication (b) Other alternativesThe working link for Client Side Interportlet Communication is http://www.liferay.com/web/guest/community/wiki/-/wiki/1071674/Client-side+Inter-Portlet+Communication 投票するためにはログインが必要です。 次として送信する: キャンセル Jorge Ferrer Rajesh Thekkadath 15年 前 Fixed, thanks Rajesh. 投票するためにはログインが必要です。 次として送信する: キャンセル
Peter Shin 15年 前 This was really helpful to read. Thanks Jorge! btw, the new Liferay Wiki looks great! 投票するためにはログインが必要です。 次として送信する: キャンセル