Morad Ahmad Il y a 10 années Great News, I am very interested on the implementing of alloy and liferay-ui:tags as JSF components (ratings, discussions, permissions...). These will allow integrating JSF-Portlets with other Liferay Frameworks (search Portlet, Asset Publisher, Comments, Social Bookmarks etc.). Since the most important advantage using JSF are ready to use components (in think so), this will be a huge step forward. Missing these tags make me prefer using MVCPortlet/jsp, although I normaly would work with JSF...Thanks Neil,Morad. Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler Neil Griffin Morad Ahmad Il y a 10 années Hi Morad,Thanks for the feedback. Our initial focus will be on Facelet component tags for liferay-faces-allloy but we will also be focussing on adding more tags for liferay-faces-portal as well. We plan on releasing new tags in an iterative manner.I would be interested to know what priority you would assign to developing specific Facelet tags for liferay-faces-portal. For example, is liferay-ui:discussion more important than liferay-ui:ratings?Kind Regards,Neil Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler Morad Ahmad Neil Griffin Il y a 10 années Hi Neil,yes i think ui:rating is a complicated tag for displaying comments threads and adding comments ... With only 1 tag. A developer needs days (even weeks) to implement it in JSF...The ui-ratings is much simpler and can be implemented with e.g. primeFaces Rating component. Are their any comments/notes/samples about integrating JSF-Portlets with:- Asset Publisher- Search Portlet- CategoriesThank to the LiferayFaces-Team for the great work. Best Regards,Morad. Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler
Neil Griffin Morad Ahmad Il y a 10 années Hi Morad,Thanks for the feedback. Our initial focus will be on Facelet component tags for liferay-faces-allloy but we will also be focussing on adding more tags for liferay-faces-portal as well. We plan on releasing new tags in an iterative manner.I would be interested to know what priority you would assign to developing specific Facelet tags for liferay-faces-portal. For example, is liferay-ui:discussion more important than liferay-ui:ratings?Kind Regards,Neil Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler Morad Ahmad Neil Griffin Il y a 10 années Hi Neil,yes i think ui:rating is a complicated tag for displaying comments threads and adding comments ... With only 1 tag. A developer needs days (even weeks) to implement it in JSF...The ui-ratings is much simpler and can be implemented with e.g. primeFaces Rating component. Are their any comments/notes/samples about integrating JSF-Portlets with:- Asset Publisher- Search Portlet- CategoriesThank to the LiferayFaces-Team for the great work. Best Regards,Morad. Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler
Morad Ahmad Neil Griffin Il y a 10 années Hi Neil,yes i think ui:rating is a complicated tag for displaying comments threads and adding comments ... With only 1 tag. A developer needs days (even weeks) to implement it in JSF...The ui-ratings is much simpler and can be implemented with e.g. primeFaces Rating component. Are their any comments/notes/samples about integrating JSF-Portlets with:- Asset Publisher- Search Portlet- CategoriesThank to the LiferayFaces-Team for the great work. Best Regards,Morad. Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler
Neil Griffin Il y a 10 années Hi Morad,Thanks so much for the kind and encouraging words. We are very excited about the Liferay Faces project and the opportunity to develop these new components.Although we have many demo portlets available, we don't have any comments/notes/samples on how to integrate JSF with out-of-the-box Liferay featuers like the Asset Publisher, Search Portlet, Categories, etc.. But will keep those use-cases in our thinking as we prioritize development of components.Kind Regards,Neil Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler
lpu123 xyz Il y a 10 années Hi Neil,since PrimeFaces-4.1.0.m1 is now implemented for JSF2.2, so it is possible to update the pom.xml and web.xml for using the EL-Impl. by SUN (com.sun.el.ExpressionFactoryImpl) for using the Method-Expression with parameters! It have tried it, and it worked!Question: Is there any causes, for continueing to use EL-Impl by JBOSS (org.jboss.el.ExpressionFactoryImpl) ?1) Untill now:pom.xml: <dependency> <groupId>org.jboss.seam</groupId> <artifactId>jboss-el</artifactId> <version>2.0.1.GA</version> </dependency>web.xml: <context-param> <param-name>com.sun.faces.expressionFactory</param-name> <!-- Instruct Mojarra to utilize JBoss-EL instead of the EL implementation provided by the servlet container. --> <param-value>org.jboss.el.ExpressionFactoryImpl</param-value> </context-param>2) coud/should update to ?: <dependency> <groupId>org.glassfish.web</groupId> <artifactId>el-impl</artifactId> <version>2.2</version> </dependency> web.xml: <context-param> <param-name>com.sun.faces.expressionFactory</param-name> <param-value>com.sun.el.ExpressionFactoryImpl</param-value> </context-param> Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler Neil Griffin lpu123 xyz Il y a 10 années Thanks so much for raising the issue about our usage of JBoss-EL. I just did an investigation and created the following issue: https://issues.liferay.com/browse/FACES-1892 Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler
Neil Griffin lpu123 xyz Il y a 10 années Thanks so much for raising the issue about our usage of JBoss-EL. I just did an investigation and created the following issue: https://issues.liferay.com/browse/FACES-1892 Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler