Rocco Germinario Il y a 6 années Hi,where is this property declared and which version? I couldn't find it in portal.properties and it's not working in 7.0.2 Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler David H Nebinger Rocco Germinario Il y a 6 années You won't find it listed in portal.properties at all.It wasn't supported in initial versions of 7.0; I know it went in about 6 months ago in DXP, so it may only now be available in 7.0 GA4.And if you're not at GA4 yet, I'd recommend upgrading when you can. Lots of bug fixes, etc over the earlier GAs... Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler Amos Fong David H Nebinger Il y a 6 années Are lpkg's extra vulnerable to tampering in different ways than the jars or anything else in the app server? Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler David H Nebinger Amos Fong Il y a 6 années They are not more vulnerable, but I think it is really a shared facility with lpkg downloads from the marketplace where having the system verify the lpkg with the known value to ensure the download hasn't been modified prior to or during download.Note that this is a guess on my part, I'm not really privy to why it was put in, the role it was meant to have and how widely it is to be used. These are more like educated guesses on my part. Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler Amos Fong David H Nebinger Il y a 6 années I checked with Shuyang and he said the lpkg validator was to make sure everything can resolve. And he confirmed the property should be used on developer machines only. Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler
David H Nebinger Rocco Germinario Il y a 6 années You won't find it listed in portal.properties at all.It wasn't supported in initial versions of 7.0; I know it went in about 6 months ago in DXP, so it may only now be available in 7.0 GA4.And if you're not at GA4 yet, I'd recommend upgrading when you can. Lots of bug fixes, etc over the earlier GAs... Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler Amos Fong David H Nebinger Il y a 6 années Are lpkg's extra vulnerable to tampering in different ways than the jars or anything else in the app server? Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler David H Nebinger Amos Fong Il y a 6 années They are not more vulnerable, but I think it is really a shared facility with lpkg downloads from the marketplace where having the system verify the lpkg with the known value to ensure the download hasn't been modified prior to or during download.Note that this is a guess on my part, I'm not really privy to why it was put in, the role it was meant to have and how widely it is to be used. These are more like educated guesses on my part. Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler Amos Fong David H Nebinger Il y a 6 années I checked with Shuyang and he said the lpkg validator was to make sure everything can resolve. And he confirmed the property should be used on developer machines only. Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler
Amos Fong David H Nebinger Il y a 6 années Are lpkg's extra vulnerable to tampering in different ways than the jars or anything else in the app server? Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler David H Nebinger Amos Fong Il y a 6 années They are not more vulnerable, but I think it is really a shared facility with lpkg downloads from the marketplace where having the system verify the lpkg with the known value to ensure the download hasn't been modified prior to or during download.Note that this is a guess on my part, I'm not really privy to why it was put in, the role it was meant to have and how widely it is to be used. These are more like educated guesses on my part. Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler Amos Fong David H Nebinger Il y a 6 années I checked with Shuyang and he said the lpkg validator was to make sure everything can resolve. And he confirmed the property should be used on developer machines only. Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler
David H Nebinger Amos Fong Il y a 6 années They are not more vulnerable, but I think it is really a shared facility with lpkg downloads from the marketplace where having the system verify the lpkg with the known value to ensure the download hasn't been modified prior to or during download.Note that this is a guess on my part, I'm not really privy to why it was put in, the role it was meant to have and how widely it is to be used. These are more like educated guesses on my part. Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler Amos Fong David H Nebinger Il y a 6 années I checked with Shuyang and he said the lpkg validator was to make sure everything can resolve. And he confirmed the property should be used on developer machines only. Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler
Amos Fong David H Nebinger Il y a 6 années I checked with Shuyang and he said the lpkg validator was to make sure everything can resolve. And he confirmed the property should be used on developer machines only. Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler
Andrew Jardine Il y a 6 années Might be an idea to have this property added to the portal-developer.properties so that people who are in development mode get access to this setting automagically. Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler