John Arne Il y a 16 années Why don't you just use checkstyle? Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler Minhchau Dang John Arne Il y a 16 années - Edité I'd never heard of the checkstyle project (http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/) before your reply. Thanks for the heads up! At a glance, it likely satisfies the style requirements for a lot of different projects. But, on its own, it still falls short of the Liferay coding requirements described in the wiki.checkstyle provides one extra feature that Jalopy didn't support (naming conventions), so if we combine all the known tools (both free and commercial), we come pretty close. The only things missing are naming conventions for private methods but not public methods, and grouping of getters and setters for readability. Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler
Minhchau Dang John Arne Il y a 16 années - Edité I'd never heard of the checkstyle project (http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/) before your reply. Thanks for the heads up! At a glance, it likely satisfies the style requirements for a lot of different projects. But, on its own, it still falls short of the Liferay coding requirements described in the wiki.checkstyle provides one extra feature that Jalopy didn't support (naming conventions), so if we combine all the known tools (both free and commercial), we come pretty close. The only things missing are naming conventions for private methods but not public methods, and grouping of getters and setters for readability. Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler
Jorge Ferrer Il y a 16 années Hi Minhchau,That's very nice. Could you add it to the wiki article? Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler
Steffen Schuler Il y a 7 années It is an old article... what is the current state, when it comes to applying style to code? Is there a checkstyle rule file available, these days? Veuillez vous identifier pour voter. Répondre en tant que ... Annuler