Bloggers recientes

Maarten van Heiningen

4 Mensajes
22 de marzo de 2017

David H Nebinger

46 Mensajes
21 de marzo de 2017

Orsolya Kuti

2 Mensajes
14 de marzo de 2017

Sushil Patidar

9 Mensajes
7 de marzo de 2017

Jamie Sammons

Staff
7 Mensajes
6 de marzo de 2017

Zeno Rocha

Staff
15 Mensajes
28 de febrero de 2017

Sarai Diaz

Staff
1 Mensajes
28 de febrero de 2017

Neil Jin

Staff
17 Mensajes
20 de febrero de 2017

Kyle Joseph Stiemann

Staff
9 Mensajes
17 de febrero de 2017

Andy Wu

Staff
1 Mensajes
16 de febrero de 2017
« Atrás

Oh yeah, about the auto-save

Company Blogs 23 de mayo de 2008 Por Nate Cavanaugh Staff

I just wanted to drop a couple of notes about the auto-save that I didn't mention before....

1. I didn't do the bulk of the work
That honor goes to Jonathan Neal. Bchan did a lot and I made a couple of javascript changes and tweaks, but the work load credit goes to Jon for actually laying the foundation and getting it done. Go hit up his wall and tell him great job :)

2. There was a race condition
There was a bug where you had to time your save JUST so, otherwise it could stay in the state of perpetual draft. We've fixed it in trunk, and will be pushing it live here to the site very soon.

3. We changed the interval time
Instead of 10 seconds, it now saves every 30. This seems a bit more realistic to me, but we're willing to hear you guys out if someone HAS to have it saving every 10 (and can make a good general case for it).

4. It now is smarter
It now checks if you're editing a draft, to save only if the content or title has actually been edited. Otherwise it will patiently wait until you have edited.

It's stuff like this that really just makes my day, getting to work with so many smart people who can develop rapidly and get stuff out the door.
 

Respuestas anidadas Autor Fecha
Regarding the auto-save time, a case could be... Joshua Asbury 24 de mayo de 2008 5:43
引用通告 Ravali Rachuri 10 de julio de 2012 1:15
adding new comment 引用通告 引用通告 Ravali Rachuri 10 de julio de 2012 1:16
当前密码 Ravali Rachuri 10 de julio de 2012 1:16

Regarding the auto-save time, a case could be made either way. If there isn't a significant performance hit, I would probably think less time is better. With that said, I am pretty ambivalent and just happy that the functionality exists.
Publicado el día 24/05/08 5:43.
Publicado el día 10/07/12 1:15.
adding new comment 引用通告 引用通告
Publicado el día 10/07/12 1:16.
Publicado el día 10/07/12 1:16.