Liferay 6.2 + AngularJS vs Liferay 7.0 + AngularJS

[Nurul Amin, geändert vor 7 Jahren.]

I heard, it is easier to write AngularJS portlet with Liferay 7.0 (DXP) compared to Liferay 6.2.

Is it true? Why?

As Liferay natively is based on AUI, I was expecting effort to use AngularJS in Liferay 6.2 or 7.0 is similar.

What do you think?

[David H Nebinger, geändert vor 7 Jahren.]

I think the AMD loader is the part that should make it easier, making it possible to quickly add new JS extensions.

From a portlet perspective, they are similar in implementation and similar in problems.

[Nurul Amin, geändert vor 7 Jahren.]

Thanks for your reply.

AMD loader. Okay.

It would be great, if you can explain a bit more.

Thanks in advance.

[Ricardo Legorreta, geändert vor 7 Jahren.]

I could integrated AngulrJS with Liferay 6 with no problem.

Does anybody has experience t migrate AngularJS to Liferay DXP? Is there any POC?

Thanks,

[Ujjainee Sarkar, geändert vor 7 Jahren.]

Hello Ricardo,
Did you find any poc for migration? I have also migrated my angular Js portlets from Liferay 6.2CE to Liferay DXP with the help of Liferay Code Upgrade tool but none of the functions are working like before. Do you have any solution for that?

[David H Nebinger, geändert vor 7 Jahren.]

Remember that any URLs you invoke against the back end will be prefixed with "/o", so like "/o/my-angular-portlet/xxx" sort of thing.